Introduction

First and Follow in Compiler Design, Compiler design is the process of creating software that translates source code written in a high-level programming language into machine code that can be executed by a computer. Parsing is one of the crucial steps in the process of compiler design that involves breaking down the source code into smaller pieces and analyzing their syntax to generate a parse tree.

The parsing process typically involves two steps: lexical analysis and syntax analysis. The lexical analysis involves breaking the source code into a sequence of tokens, which are essentially the atomic units of the programming language. The tokens are then passed to the syntax analyzer, which checks their order and relationship to determine whether they form a valid statement or expression.

First and Follow Compiler Design sets are used to generate a predictive parser, which is a type of syntax analyzer used to check whether the input source code follows the syntax of the programming language. The First set of nonterminal symbols represents the set of terminal symbols that can appear as the first token in any string derived from the nonterminal. The Follow set of nonterminal symbols represents the set of terminal symbols that can appear immediately after the nonterminal in any valid derivation.

Overall, parsing is a crucial step in the process of compiler design, and the use of First and Follow in Compiler Design sets is an important technique in the design and optimization of parsers.

What are First and Follow in Compiler Design Sets?

In compiler design, First and Follow in Compiler Design sets are used to help generate a predictive parser for a given grammar. The First set of a nonterminal symbols represents the set of terminal symbols that can appear as the first token in any string derived from the nonterminal. The Follow set of a nonterminal symbols represents the set of terminal symbols that can appear immediately after the nonterminal in any valid derivation.

To compute the first set of a nonterminal, we must consider all possible productions of the nonterminal symbol and compute the first set of the symbols that can appear as the first token in the right-hand side of each production. If any of these symbols can derive the empty string (i.e., the ε symbol), then we must also include the First set of the next symbol in the production.

To compute the Follow set of a nonterminal, we must consider all the productions in which the nonterminal symbol appears and add the Follow set of the nonterminal’s parent to the Follow set of the nonterminal. We must also consider the case where the nonterminal appears at the end of production and add the Follow set of the nonterminal’s parent to the Follow set of the nonterminal.

The First and Follow in Compiler Design sets are used to construct a predictive parser, which can predict the next token in the input stream based on the nonterminal symbol at the top of the parser stack. A predictive parser is an important tool in compiler design, as it allows for efficient and accurate parsing of source code.

Computing First Sets of Nonterminals

Computing the First sets of nonterminals is an important step in the process of generating a predictive parser for a given grammar. The First set of a nonterminal symbols represents the set of terminal symbols that can appear as the first token in any string derived from the nonterminal.

To compute the first set of a nonterminal symbol, we must consider all possible productions of the nonterminal and compute the first set of the symbols that can appear as the first token on the right-hand side of each production. If any of these symbols can derive the empty string (i.e., the ε symbol), First and Follow in Compiler Design, then we must also include the First set of the next symbol in the production.

For example, consider the following grammar:

Css

S -> A | B

A -> a | ε

B -> b | c

To compute the first set of the nonterminal symbol S, we must consider all productions of S. The First set of A is {a, ε} and the First set of B is {b, c}. Since A can derive the empty string, we must also include the First set of B in the First set of S. Therefore, the First set of S is {a, b, c, ε}.

Similarly, to compute the first set of the nonterminal symbol A, we must consider all productions of A. The First set of A is {a, ε}.

Computing the First sets of nonterminals is a crucial step in the process of generating a predictive parser, First and Follow in Compiler Design, which can efficiently and accurately parse the source code written in a given grammar.

Computing First Sets of Terminals

In the context of compiler design and parsing, computing the First sets of terminals is not a common practice, as the First sets are typically computed for nonterminals. The First set of a nonterminal symbols represents the set of terminal symbols that can appear as the first token in any string derived from the nonterminal.

However, it is possible to compute the First sets of terminals directly from the production of a grammar. First and Follow in Compiler Design, The First set of a terminal symbol is simply the set consisting of the terminal symbol itself.

For example, consider the following grammar:

Rust

S -> aBc | dEf

B -> g | ε

The First set of the terminal symbol a is {a}. The First set of the terminal symbol d is {d}. The First set of the terminal symbol g is {g}. The First set of the terminal symbol c is {c}. The First set of the terminal symbol E is {E}. Note that E is a terminal symbol that appears in the production dEf.

Computing the First sets of terminals may not be very useful in practice, as the goal of generating the First sets is typically to construct a predictive parser, which relies on the First sets of nonterminals. However, First and Follow in Compiler Design, understanding the concept of the First set of a terminal symbol can help in understanding the overall concept of the First set and its role in compiler design and parsing.

Computing Follow Sets of Nonterminals

In compiler design and parsing, computing the Follow sets of nonterminals is an important step in constructing a predictive parser for a given grammar. The Follow set of a nonterminal symbol represents the set of terminal symbols that can appear immediately after the nonterminal in any string derived from the grammar.

To compute the Follow set of a nonterminal symbol, we must consider all productions in which the nonterminal appears. For each such production, we must identify the set of symbols that can appear immediately after the nonterminal. First and Follow in Compiler Design, If the nonterminal is the last symbol in the production, then we must also consider the Follow set of the symbol to the left of the nonterminal.

For example, consider the following grammar:

Css

S -> AaB

A -> b | ε

B -> c | ε</ p>

To compute the Follow set of the nonterminal symbol A, we must consider all productions in which A appears. The Follow set of A includes the First set of a, which is {a}. Since A can derive the empty string, we must also include the Follow set of S in the Follow set of A. The Follow set of S is the set of symbols that can follow S in any derivation, which is {a}. Therefore, the Follow set of A is {a}.

Similarly, to compute the Follow set of the nonterminal symbol B, we must consider all productions in which B appears. The Follow set of B includes the Follow set of S, which is {a}, and the Follow set of A, which is {a}. Since B can also derive the empty string, we must also include the Follow set of A in the Follow set of B. Therefore, the Follow set of B is {a, b}.

Computing the Follow sets of nonterminals is a crucial step in the process of generating a predictive parser, which can efficiently and accurately parse the source code written in a given grammar.

Click here to know about: data science course Chennai

LL(1) Parsing and Predictive Parsing

LL(1) parsing is a type of top-down parsing in which the leftmost derivation of a grammar is constructed using a single look-ahead token. This means that, given the current nonterminal symbol and the next input symbol, the parser can determine which products to use to expand the nonterminal symbol. LL(1) parsing is widely used in compiler design and is efficient because it requires only a single token of lookahead.

Predictive parsing is a type of LL(1) parsing that uses a predictive parser to determine the leftmost derivation of the input string. A predictive parser is a type of LL(1) parser that uses a predictive parsing table to determine the production to use for each nonterminal symbol in the grammar. The predictive parsing table is constructed by computing the First and Follow in Compiler Design sets of each nonterminal symbol in the grammar.

To construct the predictive parsing table, we first compute the First and Follow in Compiler Design sets of each nonterminal symbol in the grammar. Then, we fill in the parsing table with the productions to be used for each nonterminal symbol and lookahead token combination. If there is a conflict in the parsing table, the grammar is not LL(1) and cannot be parsed using predictive parsing.

Predictive parsing is efficient because it requires only one token of lookahead and can quickly determine the next production to apply. However, not all grammars are LL(1), and it may not always be possible to construct a predictive parsing table. In such cases, other parsing algorithms, types of algorithms, such as LR parsing, may be used.

Error Detection in Predictive Parsing

In predictive parsing, error detection is an essential component to ensure that the input string is syntactically correct and can be parsed by the parser. The error detection mechanism can detect errors such as missing or extra tokens, misplaced tokens, and syntax errors.

There are two types of errors in predictive parsing: predictive parsing table errors and syntax errors. Predictive parsing table errors occur when there is a conflict in the parsing table, and the parser cannot determine the production to use for a particular nonterminal symbol and lookahead token combination. Syntax errors occur when the input string is not syntactically correct according to the grammar rules.

To detect predictive parsing table errors, the parsing table must be constructed correctly, and conflicts must be resolved. If a conflict is detected in the parsing table, the grammar is not LL(1), and the predictive parser cannot be used.

To detect syntax errors, the predictive parser uses the error recovery mechanism. When the parser encounters an error, it tries to recover it by discarding tokens or inserting missing tokens to continue parsing the input string. The parser can also report an error message to the user, indicating the location and type of error.

The error detection mechanism is crucial in predictive parsing because it ensures that the input string is correctly parsed and helps the programmer identify and fix errors in the source code. It also improves the efficiency of the parser by recovering from errors and continuing the parsing process.

Limitations of LL(1) Parsing and How to Overcome Them

LL(1) parsing is a powerful and efficient parsing technique used in many compilers and programming languages. However, it has several limitations that can make it difficult to use for some grammar. These limitations include left recursion, common prefixes, and ambiguity.

Left recursion is a common problem in LL(1) parsing, where a nonterminal symbol can derive itself in the leftmost position of production. This problem can lead to an infinite loop in the parser and make it impossible to construct a parsing table. One way to overcome this limitation is to eliminate left recursion by rewriting the grammar rules using right recursion.

Common prefixes occur when two or more productions share the same prefix in their right-hand side. First and Follow in Compiler Design, This problem can lead to conflicts in the parsing table and make it difficult to determine which products to use. To overcome this limitation, the grammar rules can be refactored to eliminate common prefixes or by using a more powerful parsing algorithm, such as LR parsing.

Ambiguity is another limitation of LL(1) parsing, where a grammar has two or more possible parse trees for the same input string. First and Follow in Compiler Design, This problem can lead to incorrect parsing or a large number of conflicts in the parsing table. To overcome this limitation, the grammar rules can be rewritten to remove ambiguity or by using a more powerful parsing algorithm, such as LALR parsing.

In conclusion, while LL(1) parsing is a powerful and efficient parsing technique, First and Follow in Compiler Design, it has some limitations that can make it difficult to use for some grammar. However, these limitations can be overcome by refactoring the grammar rules or using more powerful parsing algorithms.

Also read: data analyst course in Bangalore

Applications of First and Follow in Compiler Design Sets in Compiler Design

First and Follow in Compiler Design sets are important tools in compiler design for constructing efficient and accurate parsers. Some of the applications of First and Follow in Compiler Design sets include:

Predictive parsing: First and Follow in Compiler Design sets are used to construct the parsing table for predictive parsing algorithms such as LL(1) parsing. The first set of nonterminal symbols is used to determine which product to use when parsing the input, while the following set is used to detect and recover from parsing errors.

Error recovery: Follow sets are used to detect and recover from parsing errors in LL(1) parsers. If the parser encounters an unexpected symbol in the input, it can use the following set of the current nonterminal symbol to skip ahead and resume parsing at a later point.

Optimization: First sets can be used to optimize the parsing process by reducing the number of parsing decisions that need to be made. By precomputing the first sets of all the nonterminal symbols in the grammar, the parser can quickly determine which productions to use based on the first symbol in the input.

Code generation: First and Follow in Compiler Design sets can also be used to generate code for a compiler. The first set of a nonterminal sym
bol can be used to generate code for the first part of a production, while the following settings can be used to generate code for error handling and recovery.

In conclusion, First and Follow in Compiler Design sets are essential tools in compiler design for constructing efficient and accurate parsers. They are used in various applications such as predictive parsing, error recovery, optimization, and code generation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, First and Follow in Compiler Design sets are crucial concepts in compiler design and play a vital role in constructing efficient and accurate parsers. First sets help in determining the possible terminal symbols that can be derived from a nonterminal symbol, whereas follow sets help in detecting and recovering from parsing errors.

These sets are useful in predictive parsing algorithms like LL(1) parsing, where the parsing table is constructed using the First and Follow in Compiler Design sets of the nonterminal symbols. They are also used for optimizing the parsing process, generating code for a compiler, and error recovery.

Despite their limitations, like those in LL(1) parsing, First and Follow in Compiler Design sets are widely used in compiler design, and many parsers are constructed using these sets. Therefore, it is essential to understand their applications and limitations to build efficient parsers and compilers.

Frequently Asked Questions